Van Dine's Commandments: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The reader must have equal opportunity with the detective for solving the mystery. All clues must be plainly stated and described. |
The reader must have equal opportunity with the detective for solving the mystery. All clues must be plainly stated and described. |
||
In ''Umineko no Naku Koro ni'': It is forbidden to have a crime without all |
In ''Umineko no Naku Koro ni'': It is forbidden to have a crime without all clues presented. |
||
=== Van Dine's Second === |
=== Van Dine's Second === |
||
No willful tricks or deceptions may be placed on the reader other than those played legitimately by the criminal on the detective himself. |
No willful tricks or deceptions may be placed on the reader other than those played legitimately by the criminal on the detective himself. |
||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
The motives for all crimes in detective stories should be personal. International plotting and war politics belong in a different category of fiction — in secret-service tales, for instance. But a murder story must be kept gemütlich, so to speak. It must reflect the reader's everyday experiences, and give him a certain outlet for his own repressed desires and emotions. |
The motives for all crimes in detective stories should be personal. International plotting and war politics belong in a different category of fiction — in secret-service tales, for instance. But a murder story must be kept gemütlich, so to speak. It must reflect the reader's everyday experiences, and give him a certain outlet for his own repressed desires and emotions. |
||
=== Van Dine's Twentieth === |
=== Van Dine's Twentieth === |
||
And (to give my Credo an even score of items) I herewith list a few of the devices which no self-respecting detective story writer will now avail himself of. They have been employed too often, and are familiar to all true lovers of literary crime. To use them is a confession of the author's ineptitude and lack of originality |
And (to give my Credo an even score of items) I herewith list a few of the devices which no self-respecting detective story writer will now avail himself of. They have been employed too often, and are familiar to all true lovers of literary crime. To use them is a confession of the author's ineptitude and lack of originality. |
||
{{plainlist| |
|||
:*(a) Determining the identity of the culprit by comparing the butt of a cigarette left at the scene of the crime with the brand smoked by a suspect. |
|||
:*(b) The bogus spiritualistic séance to frighten the culprit into giving himself away. |
|||
:*(c) Forged fingerprints. |
|||
:*(d) The dummy-figure alibi. |
|||
:*(e) The dog that does not bark and thereby reveals the fact that the intruder is familiar. |
|||
:*(f) The final pinning of the crime on a twin, or a relative who looks exactly like the suspected, but innocent, person. |
|||
:*(g) The hypodermic syringe and the knockout drops. |
|||
:*(h) The commission of the murder in a locked room after the police have actually broken in. |
|||
:*(i) The word association test for guilt. |
|||
:*(j) The cipher, or code letter, which is eventually unraveled by the sleuth. |
|||
}} |
|||
[[Category:Umineko no Naku Koro ni]] |
[[Category:Umineko no Naku Koro ni]] |