Van Dine's Commandments: Difference between revisions

mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 29:
A servant must not be chosen by the author as the culprit. This is begging a noble question. It is a too easy solution. The culprit must be a decidedly worth-while person — one that wouldn't ordinarily come under suspicion.
 
In ''Umineko no Naku Koro ni'': It is forbidden for a servant to be the culprit!
=== Van Dine's Twelfth ===
There must be but one culprit, no matter how many murders are committed. The culprit may, of course, have a minor helper or co-plotter; but the entire onus must rest on one pair of shoulders: the entire indignation of the reader must be permitted to concentrate on a single black nature.
 
In ''Umineko no Naku Koro ni'': ItThere ismust forbiddenbe forbut aone servant to be thetrue culprit! .
 
=== Van Dine's Thirteenth ===
Secret societies, camorras, mafias, et al., have no place in a detective story. A fascinating and truly beautiful murder is irremediably spoiled by any such wholesale culpability. To be sure, the murderer in a detective novel should be given a sporting chance; but it is going too far to grant him a secret society to fall back on. No high-class, self-respecting murderer would want such odds.